Class 3/5

It was interesting see IBM's 5 in 5.  I have seen similar articles in many publications lately.  For example, Business Week has the 20 Most Important Inventions of the Next 10 Years.  As in IBM's list, BW includes technologies that streamline human / computer communication.  In this case it allowing the body's energy to charge devices.  However most of the innovation differ which is great to see.  Check it out: www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/feb2009/id20090225_287985.htm?chan=innovation_innovation+%2B+design_top+stories

Throughout this quarter, examples have been given of smart infrastructure.  This has included smart parking systems, notifying drivers when and where empty parking spots are.  Such innovations make routine tasks such as parking more efficient, saving consumer time and gas spend in addition to reducing carbon emissions.  Smart grid technology is currently being developed which will alter use of conventional civic infrastructure, offering consumers more efficient means of energy distribution and transmission.  And, did you know that right here in our backyard, we have the smartest bridge in the country, the 35W bridge.  The bridge is embedded with sensor technology to detect structural stress & monitor vibration.  As well the bridge's sprinkler system automatically de-ices the roadway when ice is detected.  Here is an article about the bridge's technology and new business opportunities in smart infrastructure: 

www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_09/b4121042656141.htm?chan=innovation_architecture_top+stories 

Class 3/2

The discussion on security was very frightening, particularly if there is really nothing one can do to protect themselves against hackers or theft.  While I realize there are several thing one can to protect themselves, a computer / internet user is never bulletproof or truly safe.  Furthermore, doing the most to protect yourself from hackers & theft requires incredible time and effort.  This is certainly a new reality for cultures now wholly dependent on networked communication.  Given that one can never truly be safe, I wonder how much effort is worth putting in to protect oneself. 

I was glad that class on Tuesday ended on a more uplifting note with Oscar presenting his experience with SOA at his former job.  This example certainly clarified the concept.  It was also great to learn more about my classmate's experience.   Oscar's presentation was interesting, well planned and very clear.  I really appreciated this opportunity.  

Class 2/24

The discussion about Facebook and its struggle for profitability was incredibly interesting. Given the impact the site has had on culture and its membership that spans generations, it is puzzling how this does not necessarily translate into business success. A wildly popular innovation that connects people in a new ways, reaching mass user-ship faster than the most notable technologies of our recent past, it is amazing that the company lacks a compelling business model. While both technology and business in this case drove innovation, Facebook illustrates that the successful combination of the two does not necessarily lead to a successful business. Viable business models for new technologies are thus a critical consideration in bringing innovations to market.

So what does Facebook 3.0 look like? Will I be able to locate my friends on a map on my iphone? Will my phone then give my car directions to drive to meet them? Will it know the fastest way and automatically route me away from traffic or accidents? Will it be able to link my schedule with that of my friends to figure out when we can have plans and then check my favorite resturants for avialablity and make a reservation for me? It is amazing to consider the possibilities for the next iteration of our current tools. Flexibility, adaptablilty, nibleness and continuous learning are certainly essential to keep up increasingly rapidly evolving technologies...

Class 2/19

I enjoyed our guest speaker, Peter Stilson of Godengo. The company serves a very niche market of regional lifestyle magazines. As a reader of such publications, the service Godengo provides is invaluable. I use magazine websites frequently to the best local restaurants and services. With the content I am interested in free and available online, I no longer find it necessary to purchase local lifestyle magazines. With print publication subscriptions down, magazines and newspapers folding everyday, printed media is a struggling industry. It is interesting to think of how Godengo's services impact this industry's life cycle. Are the magazine's websites cannibalizing magazine sales? Will web content, which is more timely, current and dynamic, become the primary revenue drivers for magazines? If so, will print disappear altogether? Publications must create new business models to stay relevant and competitive. Technology services such as those that Gogengo provides are morphing and reshaping entire industries. I am waiting for Godengo's mobile apps for my iphone...

On another note, I watched "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" last week and the movie won this oscar this weekend for best visual effects. New visual effects technology was used to create a completely digital human head for Brad Pitts character the first hour of the movie. The digital head was on a human body in the movie. It was increadible and very seamless. The designers abandonded existing technology (motion capture) being used in the film industry because the detail / resolution was not compelling enough. They instead created a database of every motion that Brad's face can make and transposed this data on top of molds of old Brad's head. One of the designers who worked on this project, Ed Ulbrich of Digital Domain explains this much bestter in this video: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/ed_ulbrich_shows_how_benjamin_button_got_his_face.html

Class 2/17

I appreciated the discussion on knowledge exchange. Phill's answer to the question is exactly how I originally understood the relationship between knowledge management and knowledge exchange. Phil viewed exchange as a subset of or mechanism of knowledge management. However, as the discussion continued, Doug explained that Knowledge Management is about explicit knowledge (codifying the ability to access knowledge), while Knowledge Exchange is about tacit knowledge (information you learn from someone else, through communication). Given this definition Knowledge Exchange is incredibly valuable to an organization and individuals within an organization. As it cannot be codified, it drives unique insight and wisdom.

If Knowledge Exchange is about what you learn from others, through direct interaction, engagement and communication, what role does technology play in Knowledge Exchange? Can tacit knowledge be codified? How can technology make individual tacit knowledge available to others in an organization? From our discussion in class, it would seem that technology's role in Knowledge exchange is minimal, whereas technology is paramount to effective Knowledge Management. While technology can play a role in the value chain that facilitates building wisdom, what drives knowledge exchange is people, not technology. Knowledge exchange is not about efficiency and standardization, but rather about individuals listening, learning, being resourceful and taking time to engage.

Class 2/12

It is clear the business component maps can be an incredibly useful tool for understanding an enterprise. The in-class exercise of developing a model for the finance department of an organization certainly illustrated how challenging the task of developing a model is. While this exercise was valuable, I think it would have been more effective to develop a model for an organization that I have worked at. A deep understanding of an organization's specific structure, functions and competencies are necessary to truly make this model effective. Perhaps, for our take home Knowledge Exchange pov assignment, rather than modeling for an abstract organization, we could have tried to utilize this tool on an organization we work or have worked for. In this way, the impact of what this approach reveals would be more relevant and powerful.

On another note, I came to appreciate technological backups over the last several days out of technology frustration. While wireless communications offer great flexibility and efficiency, when these systems become vulnerable great inefficiencies result. As students, we depend on wireless Internet access from our laptops while at school. When the wireless system fails, we spend hours trying to log back on, make our connection more robust and figure out short and long term solutions. As a result we lose time spent on completing productive work. As a result of a weak wireless network at school, I have become dependent on using a desktop computer, with hardwired Internet access. Similarly, my cellular phone's modem malfunctioned this weekend, and I was therefore unable to make or receive phone calls. Unfortunately, I do not have a land line. This is incredibly challenging when it is expected that everyone is available by phone at all times. We depend on access, constant communication. The new tools - wireless phones and Internet - make this possible. However, we are certainly not yet ready to abandon our more primitive technologies. Sometimes a land line and wired Internet access are a necessity.

Masters & Johnson

I enjoyed our discussion on intimacy & efficiency. I thought it was interesting how the discussion was framed for students to take a definitive position - make a case for one side or the other when, in reality the two are not mutually exclusive. Intimacy - a focus on specific needs of customers and the business - can drive efficiency. In turn, efficiency can allow firms to better service their clients. The discussion really came full circle at the end of the class - in which we finished up talking about interconnectedness. Just as corporations need to think cross functionally about their departments, mangers need to think about effeciency and specificity as interralated as well.

Regarding my last post, I just found an interesting article online that addresses use of new technology in architecture and building. This article discusses how Frank Gehry's architecture office has developed a software that they both use and sell to other design / construction professional. It is not necessarily true that architects don't drive technological change that can reduce error as Cole implied last week. Here it is: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/business/11gehry.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=gehry&st=cse